Discussion about this post

User's avatar
LCX's avatar

What I want to say is not exactly the same as this, but somewhat similar.

I have observed that, many people bind or overly bind some non-core viewpoints, figures and concepts to their value ​​and dignity. If someone criticizes those viewpoints, figures or concepts, they will feel that they are being personally attacked and start to defend and fight back as if they were protecting their bodies or partners. It seems that they have forgotten some premises or didn't carefully draw the boundaries at the beginning, although some role-playing or conceptualization may be beneficial. In short, they don't regard themselves as "people who temporarily support certain aspects of certain ideas, political figures or a country due to receiving certain information or arguments", but simply regard themselves as "supporters of certain ideas, political figures or a country".

Thus, if what they are bound to is wrong, it's difficult for them to flexibly discover and admit the mistake. Especially when the binding is long, they will piece together evidence, distort logic, basically do everything they can to prevent the ship from sinking. But in fact, they can prepare lifeboats or jump to other ships, because what they are bound to is often non-core, more external, far from being worth dying for or fighting to the end like pure spirituality, love, logic, freedom, or something similar. On the other side, if their opponents don't treat them in a binding manner just because they bind themselves, but show recognition or love for some of their essence, and hint that they can detach from the binding, I think it will help solve the problem.

Expand full comment
Mikhail Mossin's avatar

Thank you, Hakann!:)

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts